and documents posted by a hacker that hacked into the CRU facility
in the UK.
If some of the documents are real then it's just another example of don't
put anything in an email that you wouldn't printed in a newspaper, but
without the sex talk seen in normal examples of released emails.
I can't download the info to a work computer, the hacked docs are probably
chock full of virus', but the posted examples seem too good to be true:
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real tempsIf some of those mails and documents are true, then get ready with
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
tar and feathers for these people. More likely they were created by
the hackers or taken out of context. They would be more believable
if there were some off color jokes or light sex chat.